On Responsibilities, Parenting and Not Letting Your Children Read Playboy
“I don’t like this movie.”
Those words were spoken rather loudly by the young girl sitting behind me at a viewing of Where the Wild Things Are. These words were spoken just seconds before the young girl proclaimed she had to go to the bathroom or she would pee in her chair.
As you can well imagine, I was far from thrilled to be seated in front of this youngster. I was, not, however angry with her. I was angry with the grown man who had chosen to bring her to the movie in the first place.
I am well aware that parents are allowed to bring their children to the movies. I am not one of those people who feels that children should never share the same space that I am in. I love kids. I’ve taken kids to the movies before myself. I have no problem with kids in a movie theater when I make the decision to see a movie that is made is for children.
The issue here is that Where the Wild Things Are is not a movie that is made for children.
Yes, the movie is based on a popular children’s book. Yes, the movie features large puppet-like creatures. Yes, the central character of the movie is a young boy name Max. None of this, however, means that Where the Wild Things Are is appropriate for children.
I knew this was a movie for adults before I even stepped foot into the theater. I knew this because I read a few reviews of the film. I did my homework. I educated myself.
Why the hell can’t parents do the same thing before shoveling their kids into their mini vans?
When you are a parent, you have a responsibility to your children. This means you do not bring them to a movie just because you think it’s appropriate for the little ones. This means you look into the film. Any parent who would have done so would not have taken their children to see Where the Wild Things Are. And yet, I saw that exact film with quite a few children.
It’s all rather troubling if you ask me. In a day and age when Marge Simpson is on the cover of Playboy magazine, animation can no longer be the measure for determining whether or not a product is kid-friendly. Similarly, you can’t just bring a five-year-old to a movie because she likes the book it’s based on.
Children do not know any better, but adults do. Or at least they should. Most parents would not let their kids read Playboy just because a cartoon is on the cover. So why would they let their kids sit through an emotionally dark film just because it features cute furry monsters?
I’m not a parent. Maybe I am missing something. Maybe it’s now acceptable to have your children see movies that grapple with some pretty heavy issues such as divorce, loneliness, trust and betrayal. Maybe I’m way off base.
If I am, I apologize to all those parents out there who blindly took their kids to see one of the most adult films I’ve seen in a long time. I’m sorry for making assumptions about your choices. Next time I’ll go to a late-night showing of any film I think may have even the slightest appeal for children.
All I have to do then is hope that young kids still have bedtimes.
Truth be told, I have only the vaguest memories of the book. I’m not one of those people who is waiting with bated breath to see whether or not the movie will crush all of my childhood memories. I haven’t spent the better part of my adulthood imagining this moment. I’m just not that invested.
But now, it seems, Michael Jackson the performer is being resurrected. A new single is being dropped to coincide with the release a movie featuring footage from Jackson’s tour rehearsals. Rumors and allegations may have kept him down in life, but death is no match for Michael Jackson.



